|
Confrontation analysis (also known as dilemma analysis) is an operational analysis technique used to structure, understand and think through multi-party interactions such as negotiations. It is the underpinning mathematical basis of drama theory. It is derived from game theory but considers that instead of resolving the game, the players often redefine the game when interacting. Emotions triggered from the potential interaction play a large part in this redefinition. So whereas game theory looks on an interaction as a single decision matrix and resolves that, confrontation analysis looks on the interaction as a sequence of linked interactions, where the decision matrix changes under the influence of precisely defined emotional ''dilemmas''.〔See (definition of Dilemma )〕 ==Derivation and use== Confrontation analysis was devised by Professor Nigel Howard in the early 1990s drawing from his work on game theory and metagame analysis. It has been turned to defence,〔See (The future of Libya )〕 political, legal, financial〔"role playing... can also be used by investors in the form of "confrontation analysis' such as that organised by former military analyst Mike Young's (Decision Workshops )" – ''Greek Dungeons and German Dragons'', James Macintosh, ''Financial Times'', 9 November 2011.〕 and commercial 〔See (Letting agency case study )〕 applications. Much of the theoretical background to General Rupert Smith's book ''The Utility of Force'' drew its inspiration from the theory of confrontation analysis. Confrontation analysis can also be used in a ''decision workshop'' as structure to support role-playing〔 for training, analysis and decision rehearsal. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Confrontation analysis」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|